At the Nansen Center for Peace and Dialogue in Lillehammer, we immersed ourselves in a public dialogue method aimed not at agreement or conflict resolution but at fostering conditions for mutual understanding. This approach focuses on cultivating a safe space where participants are free to express disagreement and nurturing respect for varied perspectives. Through dialogue, we witnessed how learning to see from diverse viewpoints can enrich interactions without forcing consensus.
Our team led dialogues on key themes relevant to both local and international contexts, tackling complex and often polarizing issues such as:
- “Refugee Dilemma: Building a New Life or Returning to Rebuild?”
- “Breastfeeding in Public”
- “When is the Right Time for Ukraine to Join NATO?”
- “Hosting Refugees with Plans to Return Home”
- “Honoring Those Who Fight Today: How Can Society Respond?”
Each session was facilitated by two or three trained moderators to ensure balance and inclusivity, deepen the inquiry, and humanize each conversation. Leaving titles aside, participants engaged simply as people with personal insights, creating meaningful connections and a shared understanding. This structured method supports community resilience by bridging divides and reinforcing peaceful coexistence—one dialogue at a time.









